History And Philosophy Of Psychology Essay

History and Philosophy of PsychologyAbstractThis essay answers the following two artistic production object question : Critic t away ensembley audition the state that celluloid positivity and fond constructionism argon confusable in most serious respects . If they ar similar , what argon the consequences of this for psycho licit science s hereafter as a scientific discipline Conclusions are skeletal base on look into d oneHistory and Philosophy of PsychologyCritically examine the claim that analytical incontrovertibleness and complaisant constructionism are similar in rough important respectsLogical advantageousness translationLogical favorableness holds that school of thought should purport to the selfsame(prenominal) sort of HYPERLINK http /encyclopedia .laborlawtalk .com /Rigor robustness as science and that it should provide strict criteria for judging sentences sure , dishonest and intendless (Dictionary .Labourtalk .com 2005Logical positivism made use of emblematical logical remains , endorsed the verifiability principle as a criterion of meaning and bang-up importance to the analysis of language of meaning . Philosophers in this epoch (1920 - 1936 ) included Schlick , Reichenbach and Carnap . Logical positivism was born from positivism , and preceded logical empiricism post positivism and post modernismSocial constructionism definitionSocial constructionism is defined as the view that the phenomena of the amicable and cultural world and their meanings are created in human social interaction . Taken still , social constructionism can be applied to social research itself . The hail often , though non exclusively , draws on idealist philosophic orientations (Seale , C 2004 ) The idealist seeks a reassure , consoling , akin(p) universe (Stove , 1991Similaritie sThe received view is that logical positivis! m and social constructionism are anti-thetical . However , because they are similar in some important regards , this received view is not an accurate one - the following three similarities can be cadaverous amid the two disciplines Firstly , logical positivism exponents Schlick and Carnap disconnect what is cognise and experienced from scientific knowledge . The inwardness of extra-mental reality is in their eyes not possible .

as well , social constructionism draws a distinction between what is known and what is experiencedSecondly , logical positivism lengthens the doctrine of conventionalism from the commo nly accepted principles of geometry to logic , maths and some theoretical propositions . Social constructionism , albeit unwittingly , does the same to all propositions of scienceThirdly , Wittgenstein s `meaning as use thesis is drawn upon in both disciplines - in logical positivism , it is apply with Schlick s posterior defense of the verifiability principle and operationism , and in social constructionism it is invoked to bear out claims that all meanings of scientific terms are derived from the context of its usageIf they are similar , what are the consequences of this for psychology s future as a scientific disciplineThe Concise Oxford Dictionary (Fowler and Fowler , 1976 ) gives us the following definition of the term psychology : It is the science of the nature , functions and phenomena of the human sense or mind and the treatise on , or the system of this . Because it is base on a science psychology is therefore a scientific discipline . By nature , a scientific discipline develops in stages and is influenced by th! e beliefs and thoughts of it s exponents at any given...If you need to get a full essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay